17NAS
Welcome Back
Sign in to continue to your account
Based on reviewed CoreMark submissions from real 17NAS devices. There are 1 samples, ranking #88 among 124 recorded CPUs. Learn about the methodology and ranking rules.
| Architecture | x86_64 |
|---|---|
| Core specification | 2 cores / 2 threads |
| Threads | 2 |
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz |
| Maximum frequency | 2.90 GHz |
| Process | 14 nm |
| TDP | 35 W |
| Release date | Not available |
Specifications come from model records held by 17NAS. Not available means the value has not been recorded. Refer to the device manufacturer for actual configuration and power consumption.
| Score | Test device | System | Cores | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37,152 | Fujitsu Q558 | fnOS | 2 cores / 2 threads | 2026-10-07 | Reviewed |
All samples come from real user devices and are manually reviewed. Anomalous results may be flagged or removed. If you have run CoreMark on this CPU, please submit your result to help improve the data.
| Ranking | CPU model | Best CoreMark | Difference from Intel Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|---|
| #85 | Amlogic S922X | 43,467 | +17.0% |
| #86 | G4560 | 42,904 | +15.5% |
| #87 | i3-2348M | 37,992 | +2.3% |
| #88 | Intel Celeron G4900T | 37,152 | — |
| #89 | N3540 | 36,972 | -0.5% |
| #90 | R7 PRO 3700U | 36,293 | -2.3% |
| #91 | G3260 | 36,177 | -2.6% |
See the full NAS CPU ranking on the home page.
The Intel Celeron G4900T is a Coffee Lake desktop processor with two cores, two threads, a 2.90 GHz clock and 2 MB cache, manufactured on a 14 nm process. It has no Turbo Boost or Hyper-Threading. Integrated UHD Graphics 610 supports Quick Sync Video. The rated TDP is 35 W, with a configurable 25 W mode. Intel lists its launch as Q2 2018 without an exact date.
Use cases: Suitable for file sharing, backups, downloads and light home NAS services with limited concurrency. Integrated graphics can provide hardware transcoding for supported media formats when enabled by the operating system, drivers and media software. The current real test was submitted from a Fujitsu Q558 running fnOS; it does not measure networking, storage or transcoding performance.