Intel N100 vs N5105: NAS CPU performance comparison (CoreMark)

Based on reviewed CoreMark results submitted from real 17NAS devices. Learn about the methodology and ranking rules.

CoreMark benchmark comparison

MetricIntel N100N5105
Best CoreMark score 94,389 76,463
Average score 94,389 76,463
Ranking #52 / 124 #63 / 124
Test samples 1 samples 1 samples
Specification overview x86_64
4核4线程 cores
TDP 6W
Intel 7
0.8GHz		 x86_64
4核4线 cores
8 threads
TDP 10W
Details Intel N100 benchmark N5105 benchmark

On the best CoreMark score, Intel N100 is 23.4% higher than N5105.

Verdict and recommendation

Both are low-power 4-core/4-thread platforms. N100 (Intel 7, 6 W) is about 23% faster than N5105 (Jasper Lake, 10 W) while using less power. N5105 is still adequate for 4K H.265 hardware decode and pure storage, but N100 offers better expansion and longer-term driver support for Docker, virtual machines and newer graphics stacks. Prefer N100 when pricing is close.

This conclusion is based on public specifications and 17NAS measurements for reference. Your workload (bay count, transcoding needs and Docker scale) matters more than a benchmark score.

Related tools and pages

Intel N100 details N5105 details Full NAS CPU ranking RAID capacity calculator NAS power calculator Docker Compose editor NAS tutorials and articles