Vision Model Leaderboard: Best Vision-Language Models

Ranked by LMArena Vision Arena scores: users upload an image, ask a question, and vote between two anonymous models’ answers.

#1 OCRData Oct 19, 2026
Claude Fable 5 (High)Anthropic · 1337

In LMArena Vision Arena data published Oct 19, 2026, Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 (High) ranks #1 of 167 models with 1325 (14,714 votes).

Full leaderboard · OCR

30 models

Sorted by LMArena score by default; ± is half the 95% confidence interval. Category columns show the model’s score on that sub-board; – means no score.

# Model LMArena · OCR License
Score Rank Votes
1 GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiOpen 1299±7 26 11,021 MIT
2 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AIOpen 1291±7 33 11,758 Modified MIT
3 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)DeepSeekOpen 1282±12 41 2,786 MIT
4 Gemma 4 31BGoogleOpen 1282±6 43 28,054 Apache 2.0
5 Qwen3.8-27BAlibabaOpen 1281±9 44 5,124 Apache 2.0
6 Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)Moonshot AIOpen 1276±6 47 19,489 Modified MIT
7 Qwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibabaOpen 1271±5 51 22,696 Apache 2.0
8 MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomiOpen 1270±13 54 2,504 MIT
9 MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiOpen 1270±17 55 1,195 MIT
10 Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogleOpen 1268±7 56 16,862 Apache 2.0
11 Kimi K2.5 (Instant)Moonshot AIOpen 1259±12 60 2,691 Modified MIT
12 MiniMax-M3MiniMaxOpen 1259±6 61 13,947 MiniMax Community License
13 MiMo-V2.5XiaomiOpen 1256±6 64 20,901 MIT
14 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-InstructAlibabaOpen 1253±8 69 7,752 Apache 2.0
15 Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibabaOpen 1251±7 70 9,185 Apache 2.0
16 Qwen3.5-27BAlibabaOpen 1246±5 75 21,340 Apache 2.0
17 TInkling-SmallThinking MachinesOpen 1243±9 76 5,655 Apache 2.0
18 Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIOpen 1233±10 84 3,905 Modified MIT
19 Mistral Large 3Mistral AIOpen 1228±8 85 6,194 Apache 2.0
20 NNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B (NVFP4)NVIDIAOpen 1216±15 89 1,672 OpenMDW-1.1
21 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-ThinkingAlibabaOpen 1212±16 91 1,322 Apache 2.0
22 GLM-4.6VZ.aiOpen 1171±16 108 1,484 MIT
23 SStep-3StepFunOpen 1168±17 109 1,202 Apache 2.0
24 Gemma 3 27B ITGoogleOpen 1156±10 112 6,196 Gemma
25 GLM-4.5VZ.aiOpen 1151±17 115 1,195 MIT
26 Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E InstructMetaOpen 1143±12 117 3,083 Llama 4
27 Mistral Small 3.2 (2506)Mistral AIOpen 1134±11 119 4,083 Apache 2.0
28 Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct (2503)Mistral AIOpen 1132±11 120 7,209 Apache 2.0
29 Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructMetaOpen 1117±12 121 2,788 Llama
30 Molmo 2 8BAi2Open 1058±24 123 796 Apache 2.0

Scores: LMArena leaderboard-dataset (lmarena-ai on Hugging Face, CC-BY-4.0, vision config), OCR published Oct 19, 2026. Please credit the source when citing.

Sources & methodology

  1. Scores are Bradley-Terry Arena ratings fitted from human votes between two anonymous answers to the same image prompt.
  2. Categories (OCR, diagrams, homework, captioning, Chinese/English…) are separate LMArena boards computed on prompts of that type, not a breakdown of the overall score; ranks can differ a lot.
  3. Fields without public data (price, context length, release date…) are not shown; blanks are –. Nothing is estimated.
  4. Synced daily. JSON API: /api/public/vision-leaderboard.php

This week

Collecting data: 1/7 days recorded; weekly changes appear after 7 days

Synced automatically once a day; ranks are compared only between real snapshots, never backfilled.

FAQ

What is the best vision-language model right now?

In LMArena Vision Arena data published Oct 19, 2026, Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 (High) ranks #1 of 167 models with 1325 (14,714 votes).

What is each vendor’s best vision model?

Top overall entry per vendor: Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (High) (1325, #1), Google Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) (1315, #7), Alibaba Qwen3.8-Max (1313, #10), Meta Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) (1308, #12), OpenAI GPT-5.4 (High) (1303, #18).

Which model is best at OCR?

On LMArena’s OCR board (123 models), Claude Fable 5 (High) is #1 with 1337.

What is the best open-weight vision model?

50 open-weight models are listed; the top one is GLM-5.3-Flash (1294, MIT).

How is this different from benchmarks like MMMU?

MMMU and similar benchmarks auto-score a fixed question set; this board comes from blind human votes on people’s own images and questions, reflecting real-use preference. They are not convertible.