Best LLM for Creative Writing: AI Writing Leaderboard

The writing board covers five writing-related categories of the LMArena text leaderboard, one per tab: creative writing (creative_writing, default), writing/literature/language tasks, longer prompts (longer_query; not a long-context test), multi-turn (multi_turn) and instruction following (instruction_following). Scores come from blind human pairwise votes, not automated benchmarks.

🏆 #1 in Writing & literatureData Oct 22, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 (High)Anthropic · 1532.1

Claude vs Gemini: which is better for writing?

ModelScoreRankCreative writingInput / outputScore per $
Claude Opus 5.5 (High)Top Claude1532.1±11.911534.2 #1$4 / $20192
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)Cheapest Claude in top 201475.7±12.5181468.3 #18$2 / $10369
Gemini 4 Argon (High)Top Gemini1524.4±11.921523.1 #2$2 / $10381
Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)Cheapest Gemini in top 201491.5±7.5121489.1 #9$0.75 / $3.75994

When the gap is smaller than the combined confidence intervals, the rank difference may not be significant. Prices are OpenRouter quotes (USD / 1M tokens).

Full ranking · Writing & literature

417 models

Sorted by LMArena score; ± is the 95% CI half-width. Prices: OpenRouter quote (official list price if none), USD per 1M tokens.

# Model Score Rank Votes Creative writing Input / output Blended Score per $
1 LLaMA 13BMeta 809±27.7 417 513 793.7 No price yet
2 ?StableLM Tuned Alpha 7B 867.9±23.4 416 681 867.6 No price yet
3 ?Dolly 2.0 12B 872.2±22.9 415 732 863.5 No price yet
4 ?FastChat-T5 3B 907.5±20.6 414 940 901.9 No price yet
5 ?ChatGLM 6B 925.3±19.9 413 1,056 899.8 No price yet
6 ?OpenAssistant Pythia 12B 928.2±17.5 412 1,408 923.1 No price yet
7 ?RWKV-4 Raven 14B 934±19 411 1,098 933.5 No price yet
8 ?ChatGLM2 6B 952.7±22.5 410 775 940.9 No price yet
9 ?Alpaca 13B 968.2±19.2 409 1,217 967.3 No price yet
10 ?ChatGLM3 6B 972.5±20.1 408 1,108 969.8 No price yet
11 ?MPT 7B Chat 972.8±20.4 407 892 957.4 No price yet
12 ?GPT4All 13B Snoozy 973.1±31.4 406 347 971.8 No price yet
13 Gemma 2B ITGoogle 978.3±18.5 405 1,152 986.2 No price yet
14 ?Koala 13B 979.4±17.6 404 1,515 972.7 No price yet
15 Qwen1.5-4B-ChatAlibaba 1000.8±14.8 403 1,895 969 No price yet
16 OLMo 7B InstructAi2 1003.1±17.8 402 1,511 989.5 No price yet
17 Gemma 1.1 2B ITGoogle 1006±13.1 401 2,596 997.7 No price yet
18 PaLM 2Google 1006.8±15 400 2,155 991.2 No price yet
19 Code Llama 70B InstructMeta 1014.8±36.5 399 262 – No price yet
20 ?SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct 1024.5±26.1 398 627 1031.2 No price yet
21 Llama 3.2 1B InstructMeta 1029.7±14.7 397 2,047 1032.5 No price yet
22 Mistral 7B InstructMistral AI 1030.3±15 396 2,336 1028.1 No price yet
23 Gemma 7B ITGoogle 1033.8±14.6 395 2,191 1023.3 No price yet
24 ?StripedHyena Nous 7B 1034.6±17.8 394 1,271 1029 No price yet
25 Llama 2 7B ChatMeta 1037.1±11.5 393 3,454 1033 No price yet
26 Phi-3 Mini 128K InstructMicrosoft 1040.3±11.6 392 4,627 1024 No price yet
27 Code Llama 34B InstructMeta 1048.3±14.5 391 2,003 1031.4 No price yet
28 ?Vicuna 7B 1048.5±15 390 1,783 1020.8 No price yet
29 Qwen-14B-ChatAlibaba 1049.9±18.1 389 1,230 1027.4 No price yet
30 Granite 3.0 2B InstructIBM 1050.5±15.1 388 1,820 1046 No price yet
31 Phi-3 Mini 4K InstructMicrosoft 1054.4±10.3 387 5,207 1036.7 No price yet
32 Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct (June 2024)Microsoft 1056.6±11.2 386 3,382 1044.4 No price yet
33 Llama 2 13B ChatMeta 1061.5±10.7 385 4,785 1046.6 No price yet
34 Qwen1.5-7B-ChatAlibaba 1064.3±17.7 384 1,093 1034.3 No price yet
35 ?Guanaco 33B 1066.3±22.7 383 714 1079.7 No price yet
36 Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2Mistral AI 1073±10.5 382 4,703 1067.4 No price yet
37 Gemma 1.1 7B ITGoogle 1073.1±9.3 381 6,034 1059.2 No price yet
38 Granite 3.0 8B InstructIBM 1078.4±15.2 380 1,751 1070.4 No price yet
39 ?Vicuna 13B 1078.9±10.6 379 4,672 1057.9 No price yet
40 ?MPT 30B Chat 1079.3±22.5 378 647 1073.8 No price yet
41 ?Zephyr 7B Alpha 1081.6±25.2 377 569 1068.5 No price yet
42 ?Zephyr 7B Beta 1085.7±13.9 376 2,691 1102.1 No price yet
43 ?Dolphin 2.2.1 Mistral 7B 1085.9±28.4 375 382 1085.5 No price yet
44 SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1.0Upstage 1087.8±21 374 894 1089.1 No price yet
45 GPT-3.5 Turbo (1106)OpenAI 1091±13.5 373 3,932 1034.8 No price yet
46 Granite 3.1 2B InstructIBM 1092±20.8 372 850 1115.7 No price yet
47 Llama 2 70B ChatMeta 1092.7±8.6 371 9,591 1074.6 No price yet
48 Phi-3 Small 8K InstructMicrosoft 1093.7±10 370 4,639 1082.6 No price yet
49 Llama 2 70B SteerLM ChatNVIDIA 1094.4±21.3 369 836 1090.3 No price yet
50 Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta 1095.5±13.8 368 2,118 1093.9 No price yet

Show all 417 models (showing top 50)

Data: LMArena (lmarena-ai), CC-BY-4.0 · Writing & literature · published Oct 22, 2026

Sources & method

  1. Only the latest LMArena publish date is used; score, CI, votes and rank are copied from the dataset.
  2. Reasoning tiers of one model (e.g. High / Max) are separate LMArena entries and are listed separately.
  3. Prices are shown only when the entry maps to our LLM leaderboard; otherwise –, never estimated.
  4. Score ÷ blended price (3:1 input:output). A rough value indicator only.
  5. Synced daily at 06:35 UTC; if the source fails, the last good snapshot is kept.

FAQ

What is the best AI for writing?

In LMArena's creative writing category published Oct 22, 2026, #1 is Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 (High) (1534.2, 2,453 votes).

Claude or Gemini: which is better for writing?

Top creative-writing scores: Claude Claude Opus 5.5 (High) (1534.2, output $20/1M tokens); Gemini Gemini 4 Argon (High) (1523.1, output $10/1M tokens).

What is the cheapest good LLM for writing?

Among the top 20 for creative writing, the best score per dollar is MiMo-V2.6-Pro (1466.4, #20) at about $0.544/1M tokens blended; the cheapest is MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.544/1M, 1466.4).

Which vendors rank highest for writing?

By the creative writing category, each vendor's best model ranks: Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (High) (1534.2, #1), Google Gemini 4 Argon (High) (1523.1, #2), Meta Muse Wonder (Max) (1492.6, #7), Alibaba Qwen3.8-Max (1477.4, #16), Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro (1466.4, #20).

Where do the scores come from?

From LMArena: users submit writing prompts, two anonymous models answer, users vote for the better one, and scores are fitted with a Bradley-Terry model.